Connecting concepts: pressuring and other people's policies for their stuff

I made a connection between *pressuring people* and *not following their policies for their stuff*.

Brainstorming:

• suppose personA states a policy to personB regarding their property. and suppose personB acts against it. that's pressuring.
• personB could have misunderstood the policy.
• suppose personA clarified the policy, clarifying that personB acted against the policy. and suppose personB understood the clarification. now personB should be able to correctly follow the policy (to the extent that he understood it).
• It would be good for personB to restate the policy (in a way compatible with the policy) in his own words so that he exposes his understanding to personA, giving personA the opportunity to correct personB's misunderstandings. (it would have been better for personB to do this earlier, right after personA stated his policy, so that he could correct his misunderstandings at the earliest possible stage, minimizing the potential of acting against the policy due to personB's ignorance of the policy.)