Wednesday, November 27, 2024

My journey escaping the matrix of Islam

I was born/raised a Muslim. Before I got married I remember thinking that morality is important and that Islam is definitely about teaching morality. Then I watched a loved one ruin her life by following Islam. She believed demons possessed her and she sought help from exorcists instead of going to a hospital. This was shocking to me because I never believed in demons even when I was a Muslim and I never even knew that there were people that claim to be exorcists. This made me realize that my ideas were not from Islam and that my morals are far superior to Muhammad's morals. So Islam is not perfect yet it claims perfection, which means Islam is not true.

Fast-forward a tiny bit and I knew I had to raise my kids basically on my own. the other parent was sabotaging instead of helping, so it was going to be especially difficult.

Around the same time I remember thinking "I HAVE TO RETHINK EVERYTHING!!!"

I knew that I didn't want my kids to have the educational experience that I had in US public schools. I wanted to be the primary educator instead of expecting schools to do the job for me.

My conception of education at the time was very rudimentary, but I did know that philosophy was very important. I also knew that I didn't know much about it. So I knew I had to first learn philosophy to be able to teach it. So I started searching for books. I found a book about homeschooling which recommended The Classical Education. It's the education that Western people provided to their children from as far back as Ancient Greece, and it's the education that produced the great minds of The Enlightenment like Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, and the founding fathers of the USA. These people were significant to me because I've always loved Physics and the USA, my home country. No longer surprising to me, The Classical Education agreed with me that philosophy was central -- the subject that all other subjects depend on.

Around this time I remember thinking, "How did people like Isaac Newton do it?" I was thinking about all the amazing things that people like Newton created/discovered. The ideas immediately started flowing out of me -- my intuition. I immediately started writing it down. I went for 4.5 hours straight like that. I had created my theory of knowledge (How does learning work?). I felt like I had escaped the Matrix.

I still subscribe to this theory of knowledge, but I have two articles that explain things better and are infused with the wisdom that I gained from the last 13 or so years of studying the greatest thinkers of all time. Here's the short one for a general audience. Here's the long one for a specific business audience. I recommend both as a guide to learning more about epistemology / the scientific approach.

Shortly after this I found the philosophy book The Beginning of Infinity, by David Deutsch. Almost immediately I learned that David Deutsch co-founded a parenting philosophy known as Taking Children Seriously, with primary co-founder Sarah Fitz-Claridge.

I spent countless hours reading and reflecting on this parenting philosophy. This led to huge improvement in the way I interacted with my kids. There were clear improvements early on, but it took many many many years for a lot of the improvement to materialize. My daughters are now teenagers and I think they're doing great. I recall my oldest telling me recently that she's noticed that our relationship is far better than the relationships between her friends and their parents. She noticed that all her friends lie and hide things from their parents, and that she doesn't do that with me. I already knew this but it was good to hear it from my daughter.

I highly recommend everybody learn this parenting philosophy, even if you don't have kids or never intend to have kids. The ideas apply to all types of relationships, not just the parent-child relationship. It applies to the relationship with yourself too. I recommend that you read and ask questions. Sarah and David are amazing people, very knowledgeable and very kind. You can find them on twitter. You can also ask me questions. I'm happy to help guide you through learning these ideas.

Recently I've been helping people before and after leaving Islam with tons of posts/comments in this sub. Here's the April 2024 edition: 40+ (24πŸ†•) Posts helping people before and after leaving Islam .

That led me to realizing something. My focus has been wrong. So I decided my new focus, and it led to starting a new non-profit organization called Uniting The Cults (UnitingTheCults.com). The goal is to be an agent of cultural change with a vision of a world without apostasy laws, where people recognize love as the goal and rationality as the method to achieve.

I leave you with an important message from the great Bruce Lee.

Be water my friend

πŸ’˜

Friday, November 22, 2024

New project: A livestream series "Deconstructing Islam", co-hosted with Dr. Usama al-Binni

 
Starting 12/2/2024

Helping those who struggle with Islam.. and those concerned for the future of our world.

A call-in livestream dedicated primarily to helping people struggling with Islam, in all the ways that they need help with. It's also for the purpose of helping the outside world better understand Muslims/ex-Muslims and the communities we come from. So if you're looking to better understand us, how we think, and the struggles we face within our communities, this livestream is for you.

Rami is the Founder of the non-profit Uniting The Cults and the podcast/Youtube channel by the same name. Usama is a physicist, ex-Muslim activist, one of the people heading the Arab Atheist Broadcasting project, and serves on the editorial board of Arab Atheists Magazine. He's also the head volunteer at Uniting The Cults.

The first episode is planned for 12/2 Monday 2pm central. Here's the link to the livestream. Click "Notify me".

If you would like to get involved, please join the new UTC Discord Community. Here's an invite link. To learn more about it, go to this page on this website.


Monday, July 1, 2024

πŸ’˜ Helping People Before and After Leaving Islam πŸ’˜ July 2024

 

r/exmuslim icon
Go to exmuslim
Founder of Uniting The Cults ✊✊✊

πŸ’˜ Helping People Before and After Leaving Islam πŸ’˜ July 2024

The birth of Uniting The Cults was a success!

We're working to rid the world of apostasy laws. Please watch the livestream event so you can learn more about what we're doing and contribute your ideas.

➡️ Dear doubting Muslims

  • A never ending cycle of doubt πŸ†•Reddit

  • Dear Muslims, why do you believe in Islam? Youtube Reddit

  • Could God be evil? Discuss. Youtube Reddit

  • Religions give you purpose, which is why many people want to believe in some sort of religion | Let's help people by showing them how we think | Dear atheists, what is your purpose? Youtube Reddit

  • Dear Muslims, why do you think it matters whether or not God exists? Youtube Reddit

  • Are you a good Muslim or an evil Muslim? Youtube Reddit

  • What if I'm wrong about Islam? Let's consider the question and what is the proper response Youtube Reddit

  • Muhammad was a conman. #BetterThanMuhammad Youtube Reddit

  • Why do you believe in jinn? πŸ†•Reddit

  • How are you better than Mohammed? πŸ†•Reddit

  • "Why do you guys actually hate Islam and Muslims?" Youtube Reddit

  • Do you need more criticisms of Islam so you can reject it? Youtube Reddit

  • The Moral Mistakes of the Quran Youtube

  • Why I left Islam, but still think about it everyday. Youtube Reddit

  • "What's your proof against Islam?" Youtube Reddit

  • Dear Muslims: Do you know that Islam spread all over the world by the sword? Youtube Reddit

  • Dear Muslims, what superstitions do your parents believe in that you think are ridiculous? Reddit

  • Dear Muslims, aside from not going to hell, why should I embrace Islam? Youtube Reddit

➡️ Dear doubting Muslims and new Ex-Muslims

  • Are you struggling with doubt, fear, guilt? We're here to help. Youtube Reddit

  • Dear Muslims & ex-Muslims, what are the principles that you live by? Youtube Reddit

  • How to break free from indoctrination | With wisdom from Bruce Lee Youtube

  • Miracles Explained - Are they myth? Or science? Youtube

  • Are you feeling guilty after leaving Islam? Reddit Youtube

  • Do people shame you for being selfish, and then you feel guilty? Reddit Youtube

  • Do you spend a lot of your time debunking miracles because you're afraid of hell? Youtube Reddit

  • "You can't know that hell doesn't exist." Reddit Youtube

  • Are you afraid of being dead? Please explain why so we can help you stop fearing. Reddit Youtube

  • What's the evidence against afterlife? πŸ†•Reddit

  • "I have experienced God and that's all the evidence I need." Reddit Youtube

  • Do you feel guilty when you lie to your parents? Reddit Youtube

  • "I was Muslim for 25 years, how long does it take to reprogram everything?" Reddit Youtube

  • "Who are you to say that your morals are superior to Islam's morals?" Reddit Youtube

  • "How to strengthen my critical thinking muscle?" Reddit Youtube

  • Advice to Ex-Muslims on how to help Muslims (7 posts & 7 videos) Reddit

➡️ Ready to learn more philosophy? �

  • Try out this socratic line of questioning with Muslims and comment below with what they say πŸ†•Reddit

  • Best counter to anything a Muslim claims about Islam Youtube Reddit

  • What is an unfalsifiable claim, and what should we do with them? Reddit Youtube

  • Muslims often make the "correlation is causation" mistake Youtube Reddit

  • Islam is a "mind virus" that disables its host's critical thinking faculties. Reddit Youtube

  • When Muslims ask you what you believe in if not Allah... Reddit Youtube

  • 7 LEVELS OF HONESTY/DISHONESTY Reddit Youtube

  • Are you surprised when you see Muslims claiming to win debates that they clearly didn't win? Youtube Reddit

  • Clear example of tribalist thinking. Reddit Youtube

  • How do you continue to practice spirituality after leaving Islam? Reddit Youtube

  • Many Muslim parents are narcissists Reddit Youtube

➡️ Uniting The Cults podcast, new episodes since last newsletter

  • American convert turned ex-Muslim tells her story while we give advice to doubting Muslims | Uniting The Cults Podcast EP 9 with Jessica Artemisia πŸ†•Youtube

  • Ex-Muslim asks "How can I be of service?" | Uniting The Cults Podcast EP 10 with "A R Rahman" πŸ†•Youtube

  • Ex-Muslim wants help debunking miracles, w/ Anxiety & OCD | Uniting The Cults Podcast EP 11 with Ken πŸ†•Youtube

Some posts from last edition were removed because they weren't as good, and to make this list short and sweet. If you want to see them anyway, check out the last edition.

Sunday, June 16, 2024

πŸ’˜ The Birth of Uniting The Cults πŸ’˜ June 14th 2024 πŸ’˜ Ridding the world of apostasy laws πŸ’˜

The livestream was a success!

Thank you everyone who helped make this happen. Especially Sissi and Kat for asking questions and providing info when we needed it! πŸ’˜πŸ’˜πŸ’˜

Saturday, April 20, 2024

Morality is objective, regardless of God/religion | We're doing a livestream on this, are you interested? Fill form below.

Morality is objective. We can make moral judgements. We can judge if one moral idea is better or worse than a competing moral idea. We can find flaws in our ideas and improve our ideas so they don't have those flaws. And if they really are good enough, then other people will willingly adopt those ideas because they recognize them as better than their previous ideas. This is how memetic evolution works - idea evolution.

It doesn't matter if there is/are God(s) or not. Morality is objective either way. There are no Gods, but again, that doesn't matter to morality.

Religions should never have been created. Not only do we not need religions for morality, religions are horrible for morality. Religions cause people to be divided instead of united. Religions cause people to treat their "prophets" as authorities on knowledge. That naturally divides people because people fight about which person should be treated as the authority. People should recognize that there are no authorities on knowledge.

Christians and Muslims treat Jesus and Muhammad as infallible beings. As if we can't possibly improve on their ideas. But they were just people, like you and me. Not prophets. Just people.

Some so called prophets were horrible people and some were pretty good. I think Jesus was pretty good.

But if you think Jesus was God, or a prophet, or an authority on anything, or if you follow a religion around Jesus, or if Jesus is the only person that you consider to be a great person that influenced your worldview, then you're a horrible person. No good person has only one 'great thinker' as part of their intellectual heritage.

Consider another example. Imagine the people who consider Ayn Rand to be a great thinker but they can't name anyone else. These are horrible people. Ayn Rand was great but these people are horrible.

These people are contradicting their own heroes. Ayn Rand was influenced by many great thinkers. So was Jesus.

With that said, I am a Christian.

I am a Christian because I espouse Christ's philosophy. And in the same way, I'm also a Deutchian, an Einsteinian, a Leeian, a Newtonian, a Popperian, a Szaszian, a Fitz-Claridgeian, a Goldrattian, a Feynmanian, a Randian, a Misesian, a Socratesian, and I will continue to add more great thinkers to my intellectual heritage so long as there are more to find.

I'm planning a livestream to discuss this

On the show with me will be 2 of the 3 people that have already done the Uniting The Cults podcast with me.

No date has been set yet. I'm trying to find out from you all when would be the best time/date to do it. So if you're interested in participating, please fill this google form.

Friday, April 19, 2024

Interested in joining a livestream about Jesus's philosophy?


Backstory: Somebody asked me what I mean by "Jesus's philosophy", and since that's a huge topic, I decided to ask him to join me on my first livestream. And I asked 2 other people too, chorale11 and A R Rahman. these are 2 of my first 3 guests on the podcast.

For more backstory, here's the comment thread and post that led to this: What do you mean by “Jesus’s philosophy”? What’s your understanding of it?

If you want to know what to expect, here are the first 2 podcast episodes: 1st
2nd

If you're interested in joining, please fillout this google form:

Uniting The Cults | Livestream #1 | I'm interested

I will use this to email you the link and reminder to join the livestream. (If you would like to optout, just let me know and I'll take your email and information out of my spreadsheet.)

If you have any questions, please ask below.

πŸ’˜Be water my friendsπŸ’˜

Monday, March 25, 2024

Invitation to join us in Uniting The Cults

“The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.” ― Albert Einstein

Exmuslims in many countries fear for their safety due to apostasy laws. And this isn't going to change without good people like you and me making it happen.

For this reason I believe it is my responsibility and the responsibility of anyone who is capable to work toward a future without apostasy laws.

With that said, I invite you to join me in my pursuit.

My vision is of a world where people recognize love as the goal and rationality as the method to achieve it.

'Uniting The Cults' is a non-profit to rid the world of apostasy laws and here's what we plan to do about it:
  1. Focus on the obstacles to reaching our goal, including working with other people with projects tackling the same obstacles we face. Like social media censorship.

  2. Be an agent of cultural change regarding apostasy laws, and human rights more generally (for example, I'll be podcasting/livestreaming about these issues).
  3. Help people struggling with Islam (and similar things).

Why the name 'Uniting The Cults'?

Any group is a cult to the extent that its members do cult behaviors.

For example, many universities will fire a professor if they don't share the university's views on certain things. This is what cults do in order to discourage disobedience. And it's obviously anti-scientific.

Richard Feynman coined the term Cargo-Culting to refer to the act of doing what looks like science but is actually pseudo-science. He said even physicists are making this mistake. He dedicated his entire 1974 Caltech commencement speech to this topic. He titled it Cargo-Cult Science. You can read it here or watch it here. And he presented this as a problem, which clearly lays out the framework of the solution. Here's my answer to Feynman's speech -- The Scientific Approach to Anything and Everything.

So join me in uniting the cults as we create a united world governed by scientific thinking.

We need your help!

Do a meeting with me to be published on the UTC podcast for the purpose of figuring out how you can help us. The idea is to establish where we have a need that you can fill with your abilities. Contact me here.

Join our subreddit (r/UnitingTheCults) where we're updating people on the progress of our projects.


Sunday, February 18, 2024

My API - you can use this to help us engage with each other

This is my API. You can use it to help us engage with each other. You can get a picture of my perspective on how discussion works. You can also give me tips for improvements.

Table of Contents

  1. Some background on my perspective on discussion

  2. People go too fast, act like communication is easy

  3. If I'm wrong, and you know it, please...

1. Some background on my perspective on discussion:

People have trouble engaging with each other, coming to agreement, understanding each other's statements, understanding each others expectations and preferences, like regarding discussion, etc. Simultaneously, people try not to bug each other for fear of annoying each other, which exacerbates the problem. It results in people asking each other *less* questions instead of more. It results in people making fewer requests of each other, concerned that the other person will feel pressured. It results in less discussion than would occur if this bottleneck didn't exist or was reduced. It's a huge problem in our culture. What can be done about it?

Well what's causing it? Part of it is: Lack of APIs.

Imagine if you could engage with somebody in a way where that person posted his API, and you get to use that API to engage with that person. His API would give info about his expectations, preferences, discussion policies, interests, etc etc, which you could then use to make much better guesses about how to engage with that person in ways that would be successful.

In a person's API, he might ask other people to point out areas of potential improvement in his API. In this way, people could be helping each other improve their APIs. So if you find areas of potential improvement in this document, please tell me.

Better APIs = more effective engagement between people.

Note that since people are black boxes, people's APIs won't work exactly as described. The person won't exactly do what his API says he would do. This is an unavoidable fact but it's also something that can be made to improve without limit.

And the more work somebody puts into this, the more consistent is the connection between him (the block box) and his API. Note also that people could be helping each other improve their block-box <-> API connections.

Note that without having your own API, basically you're expecting people to use the standard API in your culture in order to engage with you -- standard cultural policies that we all kinda know. But this API kinda sucks. It's a one-size-fits-none API. It's definitely better than nothing, so I'm not hating on it -- it's partly what built our civilization. But we could do soooooo much better.

One example of something that is part of our standard cultural one-size-fits-none API is the policy of avoiding rudeness. Avoiding rudeness can often mean avoiding truth-seeking. But it's often the case that one person didn't think he was being rude but another person did. So there's a mismatch in expectations/preferences/understanding on basic issues. Having individual APIs (as against a lowest common denominator collective API) would help fix this.

Expecting our civilization to function on a collective API means treating all people as though they are fungible. We're not fungible. We're not like atoms. Atoms are interchangeable. People are not. No two people have the exact same set of ideas, expectations, preferences, emotions, intuitions, etc etc.

We should respect the fact that we're not fungible and incorporate it into our lives. Creating individual APIs is one way to respect this fact.

Note that this would have the effect of reducing verbal fights and violence. So it's something that would serve the pursuit of eradicating violence in the world.

In other words, anything that facilitates mutual win-win engagement between people will serve the goal of eradicating violence in the world, and this individual API idea is one such thing.

2. People go too fast, act like communication is easy

In a lot of discussions, people go too fast. They make only intuitional interpretations of the sentences they read. They don't do things like consciously trying to guess and criticize their way to their best interpretation of what somebody said. They just go with their first interpretation, which came to them instantly (as an intuition).

I think people feel pressured to go fast. And I'm not sure that they consciously think about the fact that they feel pressured to go fast.

It would be better if people slowed down a lot when they notice that they're having a hard time understanding each other. Fast discussion is ok when you and your discussion partner are understanding each other well, but when either of you recognize that you're not understanding each other, you should address that bottleneck by doing things like going slower, spending more time trying to work out the best interpretation of what somebody said, circling back to earlier statements to reinterpret them, stuff like that.

People act like communication is easy. They treat communication as if you say something, and they understand it, like automatically. This is true in some sense. Your intuition works automatically and pretty fast. But there's always error. You can avoid that fact but you can't avoid the consequences of that fact. We should be focussed on error-correction.

So the situation is this. You have a mindcode and I have a mindcode. They are not the same. They are not even written in the same programming language. When I say something to you, that means I'm translating my mindcode to english and you're translating my english to your mindcode. There is error in those processes.

You can't avoid error all together but you can do your best to reduce error. So it's good to do things like asking your discussion partner, "can I explain your view to see if I understand it? And you tell me if you find it satisfactory?"

It's good to clarify what a position is by checking your interpretation for error before you try to criticize the position. What people usually do is skip the error-correction step that could catch misunderstandings, and just jump straight to saying what they think is wrong with the other guy's position.

3. If I'm wrong and you know it, please...
  • If I'm wrong about something you believe is important, please tell me. 

    • Why am I doing this? This is my attempt to avoid the situation where I'm wrong about something important, someone knows why I'm wrong and is willing to explain, but I don't find out, and I lose the opportunity to change and get on the right side of the truth. In other words, it's my attempt to make a bridge between us.